Sunday, 30 April 2017

The Game Changer

Mohan Kothekar

Be a game changer the world has enough followers.

Those who swim against the current, of which, very few turned into the game changers.  Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was tossed out of the first class train compartment in South Africa; it was the pirouette point journey of his career from man to mahatma.  He was in South Africa for 21 years and uninterruptedly confronted the severe racial discrimination from whites.  He tussled for social injustice, the movement endured in India till the independence.  It was the personal and intimate revenge against the British government.  The mass movement was the brain child of Bapu; that was never been used forcefully and energetically by the contemporaries; the instrument of human force – the mass protest - was efficaciously utilized against the British government’s every misdeed.  The non-violent protest – the Satyagraha - against the British raj in South Africa emanated in to harsh and rigid punishment to the protesters that culminated into public outcry.  Mohandas Gandhi learned from every mass movement, how effectively the British government is to bring to the negotiation table to fulfill the public demands.  His education in the field of law and jurisprudence, mastery and ascendancy over oratory, negotiation skill, the so called simple leaving, relinquishment and sacrifice, staunch leadership, public contact and many more personal qualities has rounded off into a huge public strength.  Mohandas Gandhi was well equipped, experience and specialist in the field of mass communication; after return from South Africa he judiciously used the instruments of mass protest and become the messiah of undivided India.


In the year 1915, he was invited by then the Congress party leaders to lead the independent movement; in the year 1920, Gandhi became the unchallenged, undisputed and undoubted hero of the congress party and Indian independence movement.  His predominance, grip, supremacy and pre-eminence over the non-violent movement were of great extent, he became an unopposed and an unstoppable leader of the congress party till his assassination.  The critics within the family and in the public life painted him as an adamant and arrogant, charlatan, hypocrite, quarrelsome, clever politician, dictator, British agent, anti-Hindu, villain of partition and aftermath massacre and many more adjectives were affixed to describe him.  His immense and elephantine popularity in the uneducated rural masses to join the non-violent freedom struggle was unthinkable and unquestionable though the historians have criticized him for his supremacy over the stalwarts of equal repute such as Subhash Chandra Bose, Vinayak Damodar Sawarkar and Vallabhbhai Patel etc. and unremitting support to Jawaharlal Nehru.  Gandhi intentionally and vehemently opposed the freedom struggle of right Hindu fundamentalist, aggressive youth force, freedom fighters and mutiny from armed forces to maintain his command and dominance over the freedom struggle.  Had he been in principle supported these fundamental forces the nation would have been Independent in the third decade of the twentieth century.                    


Mahatma Gandhi was an adroit, parlous and shrewd politician; he did not allow and concede losing his grip over common uneducated rural masses and congress party.  Many instances from the history can be illustrated to support the claim.  On 13th April 1919, Colonel Dyer massacred more than thousand non-violent protesters and equal number of civilians was injured in Jallianwala Bagh case.  Gandhi and his associates should have openly revolted against the killing of Satyagrahis; Indian soldiers from British army were eager to take the revenge; however, Gandhi has not supported the aftermath violence in Punjab and other provinces.  Winston Churchill described the attack as ‘monstrous’ indicated the impact of Colonel Dyer’s brutality; Gandhian symbolic protest was not at all the answer, befitting reply was the expectation from general masses as did by Udham Singh on 13th March 1940 who shot and killed Michael O’Dwyer who endorsed Colonel Dyer’s outrageous and barbaric act.


Punjab Kesari - Lala Lajpat Rai protested against the Simon Commission on 30th October 1928 at Lahore, the peaceful and silent procession was mercilessly lathi (cane) charged by James A. Scott, then Superintendent of Police in which Lalaji - the lion of Punjab – was barbarously assaulted and injured.  On 17th November 1928 he died due to physical injuries and mental agony apart from heart attack.  His noble quote was ‘elevation of the doctrine of ahimsa to the highest position contributed to the downfall of India.’  He opposed the exaggerated practice of ahimsa synchronized with bereft of many virtues; though he followed basic tenets of non-violence during the peaceful procession.  Mahatma Gandhi’s articles on Lalaji after his death (Young India and Navajivan, November 1928) can be summarized in two words as ‘crocodile tears,’ had the incidence could have happened in western country it would have revolutionized the whole scenario.  Bhagat Singh, Shivaram Rajguru, Sukhdeo Thapar and Chandra Shekhar Azad have shown courage by mistakenly killing Saunders instead of James Scott, the act of reprisal and vengeance.


The quadruple took the revenge of death of Punjab Kesari – Lala Lajpat Rai by mistakenly killing Assistant Superintendent of Police, Lahore - Mr John Saunders - and owned the responsibility of the assassination.  The Congress party in general and Mahatma Gandhi in particular remained unresponsive and aloof from the saving the life of the martyrdom.  Cohesion and collaboration between non-violent satyagrahis and staunch extremist would have been a better combination or merger during independent movement; the noble concept was rooted out from the bud by the leaders of the so called hypocrite organization.  Mahatma Gandhi – a lawyer - has not intervened or mediated or meddle to plead the case of the martyred to the Viceroy.  The youths have shown black flags to Mahatma Gandhi during Karachi convention of Congress party and shouted the slogans ‘Down with Gandhi.’  It is said that Gandhi could have prevented the execution of Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdeo but he intentionally desisted from commutation of death sentence.

Despite the fact that Mahatma Gandhi was the ardent supporter of non-violent civil disobedience movements against British Raj and adversary, antagonist and opponent of armed rebellion revolutionary movement, he was a charismatic and appealing captain of common masses.  His weapons were Satyagraha, hunger strike, disobedience and non-violence that are easily, effortlessly, painlessly and permissively accepted by one and all against British Raj.  Thousands and lakhs of people joined his mission for Dandi Salt, Quit India, Simon Commission, Champaran and Kheda Satyagraha, Khilafat and other non-cooperation strikes.  His popularity disintegrated and eroded to a certain extent after independence due to his affinity and inclination towards Pakistan, especially when Indian government refused to hand over the balance of Rs 55 crore.  However, he remained the game changer throughout his life that was proved from the tides of more than two million people attended his funeral.


@@@@@@@@@@##########@@@@@@@@@@

No comments:

Post a Comment

Indian Stand: Champions Trophy

                                                                                    Mohan Kothekar It has been decided by the ...